Simply renaming and recoloring things seems like a better method of progressing. Probably not, but you would have to either make completely original characters or parody characters one way or the other. But if you went with different colors entirely, I wonder if that would work. Super Girl for example had 3 or 4 different outfits that all revolved around Red, White and Blue (mostly lighter blue if memory serves). Of course you could not use any real copyrighted names or outfits so I wonder if a palette swap would be enough or not. Now what does that mean? Blunder Woman and Suckme Girl would need to be put in place instead of their comic counterparts. The only way you could salvage this as it is, is likely to shift things into a full on parody. It makes me want to puke, but I have to agree. Just giving advice, is all I honestly hope you succeed in making western hentai, I just don't want to see you get sued into oblivion by a mammoth company. Warner Brothers is not a company that gives leeway on this. There is so much stuff out there right now that could be sued into oblivion but the companies involved don't do it because they either 1) realize the value of free advertising for their product, even if it's pornography, or 2) they work out a deal with the people(s) making the altered or similar products that works in their favor or controls the amount of alteration/content involved. Anything less, and again, they could legally argue that you have just given the same character a different costume, and the average person could still mistake them for that recognizable character (much like palette swaps in Street Fighter, for instance).Įssentially, what people need to realize is that when people cite cases where people get away with recolors or costume swaps or alterations in name or visuals when it comes to skirting copyright, that isn't because it legally WORKS, it's because that company LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT. These would need to be radically changed we're talking totally different hairstyle, costumes, maybe even body proportions. This is a MAJOR point in their case, for sure.Ģ) Your visuals of the characters (outfits, etc.) are pretty similar to the original designs. This means that someone could, in court, reasonably argue that your stuff could be confused with being official creations. Their case basically revolves around two things ġ) Your art is practically indistinguishable from the original artstyle for many of their series (even if they're older series) to the average person. If you change the name of your drugs from "meth" to "Blue Sky" and sell it on the downlow, behind closed doors, does that make it any less illegal to sell to people? WB will still absolutely have a case against you if you do this, and they'll hit harder than before because you'd be deliberately ignoring/trying to circumvent their DMCA. Shenanigans ensue.Click to expand.Highly, highly do not suggest doing this. In my edition you are the PC "lex luthor" who is re-establishing his criminal empire via rebuilding the legion and managing the glamor slam (as owner, lineup is for the help), exploiting your gamable mind control device as a reason to capture and train heroines and control or hire henchwomen. It "is" all content from SU, until it isn't.ĭo you actually like the legion heists? Glamor slam lineup planning? Meta Bordello? Any assigning micromanaging grind? Unlocking raven? Deus ex machina addons of blackfire, terra, starfire, cheshire, miss martian, etc. I'd love to hear any detailed criticism if you have a discord. The game is a work in progress which I intend to tailor to the community regarding content and gameplay. Then went on to add Artemis and Cheshire with their unlock route. Which version? I did a major rebalance after the initial release which changed up mercy's content and added her yacht sex scenes and some changes with batgirl.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |